Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-4jqp-9qjv-57m2
No affected components available
Impact
The Keylime registrar does not enforce mutual TLS (mTLS) client certificate authentication since version 7.12.0. The registrar's TLS context is configured with ssl.CERT_OPTIONAL instead of ssl.CERT_REQUIRED, allowing any client to connect to protected API endpoints without presenting a valid client certificate.
Who is impacted:
- All Keylime deployments running versions 7.12.0 through 7.13.0
- Environments where the registrar HTTPS port (default 8891) is network-accessible to untrusted clients
What an attacker can do:
- List all registered agents (
GET /v2/agents/) - enumerate the entire agent inventory - Retrieve agent details (
GET /v2/agents/{uuid}) - obtain public TPM keys, certificates, and network locations (IP/port) of any agent - Delete any agent (
DELETE /v2/agents/{uuid}) - remove agents from the registry, disrupting attestation services
Note: The exposed TPM data (EK, AK, certificates) consists of public keys and certificates. Private keys remain protected within TPM hardware. The HMAC secret used for challenge-response validation is stored in the database but is not exposed via the API.
Affected versions: >= 7.12.0, <= 7.13.0
Fixed versions: 7.12.2, >= 7.13.1
Patches
A patch for the affected released versions is available. It removes the line that override the configuration of ssl.verify_mode, leaving the CERT_REQUIRED value set by web_util.init_mtls():
diff --git a/keylime/web/base/server.py b/keylime/web/base/server.py
index 1d9a9c2..859b23a 100644
--- a/keylime/web/base/server.py
+++ b/keylime/web/base/server.py
@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ import asyncio
import multiprocessing
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from functools import wraps
-from ssl import CERT_OPTIONAL
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Any, Callable, Optional
import tornado
@@ -252,7 +251,6 @@ class Server(ABC):
self._https_port = config.getint(component, "tls_port", fallback=0)
self._max_upload_size = config.getint(component, "max_upload_size", fallback=104857600)
self._ssl_ctx = web_util.init_mtls(component)
- self._ssl_ctx.verify_mode = CERT_OPTIONAL
def _get(self, pattern: str, controller: type["Controller"], action: str, allow_insecure: bool = False) -> None:
"""Creates a new route to handle incoming GET requests issued for paths which match the given
Users should upgrade to the patched version once it is released.
Workarounds
If upgrading is not immediately possible, apply one of the following mitigations:
1. Network isolation (Recommended)
Restrict access to the registrar HTTPS port (default 8891) using firewall rules to allow only trusted hosts (verifier, tenant):
Example using iptables
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 8891 -s <verifier_ip> -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 8891 -s <tenant_ip> -j ACCEPT
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 8891 -j DROP
2. Reverse proxy with mTLS enforcement
Deploy a reverse proxy (nginx, HAProxy) in front of the registrar that enforces client certificate authentication:
Example nginx configuration
server {
listen 8891 ssl;
ssl_certificate /path/to/server.crt;
ssl_certificate_key /path/to/server.key;
ssl_client_certificate /path/to/ca.crt;
ssl_verify_client on; # Enforce client certificates
location / {
proxy_pass https://localhost:8892; # Internal registrar port
}
}
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard