Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-4h34-v6r8-mmjc

MediumCVSS 5.3 / 10
Published Aug 17, 2026·Last modified Aug 17, 2026
Affected Components(1)
PyPI logoglances
< 4.5.6
Description

Summary

Glances provides as_dict_secure() explicitly designed for unauthenticated API access, with a docstring stating it returns "a sanitised copy of the configuration dict" where "Sensitive keys in remaining sections are replaced by '********'". However, the implementation only checks KEY names against a regex pattern and never inspects VALUE content. The documented [ip] config section supports public_api (URL), public_username (login), and public_password (password). While public_password is correctly masked, both public_api (when containing embedded credentials like https://user:pass@host/) and public_username are returned in full to unauthenticated users via GET /api/4/config.

Affected Versions

Glances latest (Docker: nicolargo/glances:latest)

Root Cause

In glances/config.py, as_dict_secure():

_SECURE_SENSITIVE_KEY_RE = re.compile(r"password|token|secret|api_key|apikey|ssl_keyfile", re.IGNORECASE)

def as_dict_secure(self):
    """Return a sanitised copy of the configuration dict.
    Intended for unauthenticated API access.
    - Sensitive keys in remaining sections are replaced by '********'.
    """
    sanitized = {}
    for section, options in self.as_dict().items():
        if section in _SECURE_BLOCKED_SECTIONS: continue
        sanitized[section] = {
            key: "********" if _SECURE_SENSITIVE_KEY_RE.search(key) else value
            for key, value in options.items()
        }
    return sanitized

In glances/outputs/glances_restful_api.py:

# Line 1294
args_json = self.config.as_dict() if self.args.password else self.config.as_dict_secure()

The [ip] config section documents: public_api (URL), public_username (login), public_password (password).

  • public_password → matches "password" → masked ✓
  • public_api → no match → returned in full (contains user:pass@ in URL) ✗
  • public_username → no match → returned in full ✗

Impact

  • Unauthenticated credential disclosure via GET /api/4/config or GET /api/4/config/ip
  • as_dict_secure() exists specifically to protect credentials in no-auth mode but fails to mask public_username and credential-bearing URLs in public_api

Prerequisites

  • Glances in web server mode without --password (default, no auth)
  • glances.conf [ip] section with public_api containing embedded credentials and/or public_username set

Environment

  • Glances latest (Docker: nicolargo/glances:latest)
  • Remote Docker lab at http://10.140.200.102:8080

Reproduction Steps

docker run -d --name glances-test -p 8080:61208 -e GLANCES_OPT='-w' nicolargo/glances:latest
sleep 20
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|public_api=https://ipv4.ipleak.net/json/|public_api=https://admin:secret123@ipv4.ipleak.net/json/|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|#public_username=<myname>|public_username=myname|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker exec glances-test sed -i 's|#public_password=<mysecret>|public_password=mysecret|' /etc/glances/glances.conf
docker restart glances-test
sleep 15
curl -s "$TARGET/api/4/config/ip"
# Returns: {"public_api": "https://admin:secret123@...", "public_username": "myname", "public_password": "********"}

Evidence

See C:/Tools/glances-config-leak-evidence.txt.

Dedup Check

  • GHSA-gfc2-9qmw-w7vh covers CORS but NOT value-level credential leak
  • No existing GHSA covers as_dict_secure() value-level filtering gap
  • 13 published GHSA, none covering this issue

Suggested Remediation

Add "username" and "login" to sensitive key pattern, and check values for embedded credentials in URLs.

Disclosure Timeline

  • 2026-07-28: Vulnerability discovered and verified via Docker deployment

Reporter

GitHub username: Todor

Risk Scores
Base Score
5.3

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
4.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.24%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard