Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-45gv-9wjv-xh7p

HighCVSS 8.1 / 10
Published Oct 9, 2026·Last modified Oct 9, 2026
Affected Components(1)
Go logogithub.com/0xjacky/nginx-ui
1.9.10-0.20250517140552-daee3ac7ade1 – 1.9.10-0.20260728074558-95cd21b70814
Description

Summary

nginx-ui supports two second-factor methods — TOTP (OTP) and WebAuthn passkeys — and reports an account as 2FA-enabled when either is configured. However, the password login endpoint (POST /api/login) only enforces a second factor when a TOTP secret is present. An account that has registered a passkey but no TOTP is logged in after password verification alone — the passkey is never requested. This silently downgrades a passkey-protected account to single-factor (password-only) authentication.

Details

The account's 2FA policy treats passkeys as a valid factor (model/user.go):

func (u *User) EnabledOTP() bool     { return len(u.OTPSecret) != 0 }
func (u *User) EnabledPasskey() bool { /* true if a passkey row exists */ }
func (u *User) Enabled2FA() bool     { return u.EnabledOTP() || u.EnabledPasskey() }

func (u *User) AfterFind(_ *gorm.DB) error {
    u.EnabledTwoFA = u.Enabled2FA() // exposed to the UI as `enabled_2fa`
    return nil
}

But the login handler only checks EnabledOTP() (api/user/auth.go, Login):

u, err := user.Login(json.Name, json.Password)
...
if u.EnabledOTP() {                       // <-- only TOTP is enforced
    if json.OTP == "" && json.RecoveryCode == "" {
        c.JSON(http.StatusOK, LoginResponse{Message: "The user has enabled 2FA", Code: Enabled2FA}) // 199
        user.BanIP(clientIP)
        return
    }
    if _, err = user.VerifyOTP(u, json.OTP, json.RecoveryCode); err != nil { /* ... */ }
    secureSessionID = user.SetSecureSessionID(u.ID)
}

// Passkey-only accounts fall through to here and receive a full session token:
accessToken, err := user.GenerateJWT(u)

No branch requires a WebAuthn assertion during password login when EnabledPasskey() is true. The root cause is the mismatch between the policy definition (Enabled2FA() = OTP or passkey) and the enforcement check (EnabledOTP() only).

The same EnabledOTP()-only gating in RequireSecureSession() (internal/middleware/secure_session.go) means passkey-only users are also exempted from step-up on sensitive actions.

Proof of Concept

Tested against nginx-ui built from source (go build -tags unembed) on 127.0.0.1:9000, with WebAuthn configured and a victim account that has a registered passkey and no TOTP. The vulnerable code is identical on the production main branch (api/user/auth.go Login gates on u.EnabledOTP() only; verified at commit 6c86e5a, 2026-05-17).

Account state advertised by GET /api/2fa_status:

{"enabled":true,"otp_status":false,"passkey_status":true, ...}

Attacker logs in with password only (POST /api/login, encrypted params as the client normally sends):

HTTP 200
{"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...."}

code: 200 + a valid JWT = an authenticated session, with the passkey never used. For comparison, the identical account with a TOTP secret instead correctly returns the second-factor challenge:

HTTP 200
{"message":"The user has enabled 2FA","code":199}

| Account state | POST /api/login (password only) | |---|---| | Passkey registered, no TOTP | code 200 + JWT — 2FA NOT enforced | | TOTP registered | code 199 — 2FA challenge enforced |

This isolates the defect: the login path enforces OTP but ignores passkeys.

Impact

  • Any account protected only by a passkey is reduced to password-only authentication. An attacker who obtains the password (phishing, reuse, leak) gains full access despite the registered security key.
  • In nginx-ui all authenticated users are effectively administrators and the terminal feature grants a host shell, so account takeover leads to full control of the managed nginx instance / host.
  • Users are given a false sense of security: the UI shows the account as 2FA-enabled while the second factor is not enforced at login.

Remediation

  • Gate the second-factor decision on u.Enabled2FA() (not u.EnabledOTP()) in Login, in both SSO callbacks, and in RequireSecureSession().
  • For a passkey-only user logging in with a password, return a "passkey assertion required" challenge and complete login only after a successful WebAuthn assertion (the begin_passkey_login / finish_passkey_login flow already exists and should be required as the second step).
  • Centralize session-token issuance so no login entry point can skip the 2FA decision.

Affected components

  • api/user/auth.go — Login
  • model/user.go — EnabledOTP, EnabledPasskey, Enabled2FA, AfterFind
  • api/user/2fa.go — get2FAStatus
  • internal/middleware/secure_session.go — RequireSecureSession
Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.

Threat Intelligence
7.4

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
0.41%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard