Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-45gv-9wjv-xh7p
Summary
nginx-ui supports two second-factor methods — TOTP (OTP) and WebAuthn passkeys —
and reports an account as 2FA-enabled when either is configured. However, the
password login endpoint (POST /api/login) only enforces a second factor when a
TOTP secret is present. An account that has registered a passkey but no
TOTP is logged in after password verification alone — the passkey is never
requested. This silently downgrades a passkey-protected account to single-factor
(password-only) authentication.
Details
The account's 2FA policy treats passkeys as a valid factor (model/user.go):
func (u *User) EnabledOTP() bool { return len(u.OTPSecret) != 0 }
func (u *User) EnabledPasskey() bool { /* true if a passkey row exists */ }
func (u *User) Enabled2FA() bool { return u.EnabledOTP() || u.EnabledPasskey() }
func (u *User) AfterFind(_ *gorm.DB) error {
u.EnabledTwoFA = u.Enabled2FA() // exposed to the UI as `enabled_2fa`
return nil
}
But the login handler only checks EnabledOTP() (api/user/auth.go, Login):
u, err := user.Login(json.Name, json.Password)
...
if u.EnabledOTP() { // <-- only TOTP is enforced
if json.OTP == "" && json.RecoveryCode == "" {
c.JSON(http.StatusOK, LoginResponse{Message: "The user has enabled 2FA", Code: Enabled2FA}) // 199
user.BanIP(clientIP)
return
}
if _, err = user.VerifyOTP(u, json.OTP, json.RecoveryCode); err != nil { /* ... */ }
secureSessionID = user.SetSecureSessionID(u.ID)
}
// Passkey-only accounts fall through to here and receive a full session token:
accessToken, err := user.GenerateJWT(u)
No branch requires a WebAuthn assertion during password login when
EnabledPasskey() is true. The root cause is the mismatch between the
policy definition (Enabled2FA() = OTP or passkey) and the
enforcement check (EnabledOTP() only).
The same EnabledOTP()-only gating in RequireSecureSession()
(internal/middleware/secure_session.go) means passkey-only users are also
exempted from step-up on sensitive actions.
Proof of Concept
Tested against nginx-ui built from source (go build -tags unembed) on
127.0.0.1:9000, with WebAuthn configured and a victim account that has a
registered passkey and no TOTP. The vulnerable code is identical on the
production main branch (api/user/auth.go Login gates on u.EnabledOTP()
only; verified at commit 6c86e5a, 2026-05-17).
Account state advertised by GET /api/2fa_status:
{"enabled":true,"otp_status":false,"passkey_status":true, ...}
Attacker logs in with password only (POST /api/login, encrypted params as
the client normally sends):
HTTP 200
{"message":"ok","code":200,"token":"eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9...."}
code: 200 + a valid JWT = an authenticated session, with the passkey never
used. For comparison, the identical account with a TOTP secret instead correctly
returns the second-factor challenge:
HTTP 200
{"message":"The user has enabled 2FA","code":199}
| Account state | POST /api/login (password only) |
|---|---|
| Passkey registered, no TOTP | code 200 + JWT — 2FA NOT enforced |
| TOTP registered | code 199 — 2FA challenge enforced |
This isolates the defect: the login path enforces OTP but ignores passkeys.
Impact
- Any account protected only by a passkey is reduced to password-only authentication. An attacker who obtains the password (phishing, reuse, leak) gains full access despite the registered security key.
- In nginx-ui all authenticated users are effectively administrators and the terminal feature grants a host shell, so account takeover leads to full control of the managed nginx instance / host.
- Users are given a false sense of security: the UI shows the account as 2FA-enabled while the second factor is not enforced at login.
Remediation
- Gate the second-factor decision on
u.Enabled2FA()(notu.EnabledOTP()) inLogin, in both SSO callbacks, and inRequireSecureSession(). - For a passkey-only user logging in with a password, return a
"passkey assertion required" challenge and complete login only after a
successful WebAuthn assertion (the
begin_passkey_login/finish_passkey_loginflow already exists and should be required as the second step). - Centralize session-token issuance so no login entry point can skip the 2FA decision.
Affected components
api/user/auth.go—Loginmodel/user.go—EnabledOTP,EnabledPasskey,Enabled2FA,AfterFindapi/user/2fa.go—get2FAStatusinternal/middleware/secure_session.go—RequireSecureSession
Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.
Drag and drop some file here, or click to select
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard