Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-3pww-vcvm-3gmj
No affected components available
Summary
A Gitea personal access token (PAT) restricted to a non-repository scope (e.g. read:issue) can read the commit history of any private repository the token owner can access, via the repository RSS/Atom feed endpoints. The same token is correctly denied (403) on /raw, /media, /archive, and the contents API. It leaks commit SHAs, full commit messages (which frequently contain secrets and internal context), and committer name + email.
Details
Gitea enforces PAT scope on repository-content endpoints via checkDownloadTokenScope() (added in PR #37698, extended to the archive endpoint by the CVE-2026-20706 fix in 1.26.2). The RSS/Atom feed handlers were never included: they (a) opt into PAT auth via webAuth.AllowBasic, (b) serve private-repo content, but (c) never call checkDownloadTokenScope().
Affected handlers (all carry AllowBasic, none call the scope check):
RenderBranchFeedRSS/Atom-routers/web/feed/render.go(last 10 commits: SHA, title, full message, committer name + email)ShowFileFeed-routers/web/feed/file.go(per-file commit history)- repo activity feed
/{owner}/{repo}.rss/.atom TagsListFeedRSS/Atom,ReleasesFeedRSS/Atom-routers/web/repo/release.go
Root cause: routers/web/web.go registers the feed routes with webAuth.AllowBasic so a PAT authenticates, but the unit-permission middleware only checks the user's access, not the token's scope. checkDownloadTokenScope (routers/web/repo/download.go and the archive Download in repo.go) exists to close exactly that gap and is absent from the feed handlers. Same class as the recently fixed download/archive bypasses (GHSA-cr4g-f395-h25h / CVE-2026-20706); the feeds are the surface those fixes missed.
PoC
Tested on gitea/gitea:1.26.2-rootless, confirmed present at main HEAD (9608cc2, 2026-06-13).
- User
carolowns private repocarol/privwith a commit (message: "add confidential secret"). - Create a PAT scoped to issues only, no repository scope:
curl -u carol:PASS -X POST $HOST/api/v1/users/carol/tokens -d '{"name":"t","scopes":["read:issue"]}' - Scope-enforcing sibling correctly denies it:
curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/raw/branch/main/secret.txt-> 403 - The feed leaks private data with the same token:
curl -u carol:$TOK $HOST/carol/priv/rss/branch/main-> 200, returns<description>add confidential secret ... this commit message itself is sensitive</description>
| Auth (same read:issue token) | /raw/branch/main/secret.txt | /rss/branch/main | |---|---|---| | anonymous | - | 404 (private repo hidden) | | invalid token | - | 401 | | read:issue token (no repo scope) | 403 (scope enforced) | 200 + private commit data | | full-scope token | 200 | 200 (legitimate) |
Impact
PATs are routinely issued narrowly and handed to third-party bots, CI jobs, or chat integrations that are meant to have no code access. This bypass lets such a token exfiltrate private-repository commit history (messages often hold secrets, ticket refs, internal context) and committer emails for every repository the owner can read. Confidentiality only; no integrity or availability impact. Preconditions: a valid PAT of any non-repository scope owned by a user with read access to the target private repo, and feeds enabled (Other.EnableFeed, default ON).
Suggested fix: call checkDownloadTokenScope(ctx) at the start of each feed handler (mirroring download.go). Longer-term, enforce repository token scope in a single route-group middleware wherever AllowBasic / AllowOAuth2 is set on a repo-content route, so the next added endpoint cannot miss it.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard