Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg

HighCVSS 8.6 / 10
Published Sep 4, 2026·Last modified Sep 4, 2026
Affected Components(1)
Go logogithub.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel
< 0.0.0-20260725123945-77421530be4a
Description

CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72794.

Summary

/api/system/getConf returns Conf.CookieKey, the key used to sign the server's session cookies in its response body. The endpoint is registered with CheckAuth only, so the field reaches the publish RoleReader token and the anonymous account when Publish.Auth.Enable is false.

The configuration-export endpoint in the same file strips this exact field before returning config, so the project already treats it as secret. The reader-facing masking path does not.

Details

| Item | Detail | |---|---| | Route | kernel/api/router.go:70 POST /api/system/getConf → model.CheckAuth → getConf | | Middleware | CheckAuth only — no CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole | | Leaked field | AppConf.CookieKey, serialized as cookieKey | | Purpose of the field | Signing key for the siyuan session cookie |

The field survives every stage of the masking chain. getConf masks through GetMaskedConf() → HideConfSecret() (non-administrators) → FilterConfByPublishIgnore() (readers) → the browser-side System-path strip. CookieKey is removed by none of them:

  • GetMaskedConf masks UserData, MCPOAuth and AccessAuthCode only.
  • HideConfSecret nulls AI, Api, Flashcard, ServerAddrs, Publish, Repo, Sync, Secrets, Variables and the System paths. It contains no reference to CookieKey.
  • FilterConfByPublishIgnore touches UILayout only.
  • The browser-side strip removes System paths only.

The key is live, not vestigial. It is passed straight into the session store at startup:

cli/cmd/serve.go:67   go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey)
kernel/server/serve.go:152   sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey))
kernel/server/serve.go:159   ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions("siyuan", sessionStore))

gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore constructed with a single key uses that key as the gorilla/securecookie HMAC key. The siyuan session cookie is therefore signed with the value the endpoint hands out. An attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies that the server accepts as authentic.

Guarded sibling, in the same file. exportConf (kernel/api/system.go:299) clones the configuration before returning it and explicitly clears both secrets:

kernel/api/system.go:360   clonedConf.CookieKey = ""
                           clonedConf.NotebookCrypto = nil

The project has already classified CookieKey as a value that must not leave the server. The getConf masking path omits the same field.

Ceiling is environment-dependent, floor is not. Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged SessionData to carry the matching AccessAuthCode, which GetMaskedConf does mask or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is the disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party together with the cookie-forgery capability that follows from it. Rotating the key invalidates all existing sessions, so this is not a secret that can be quietly refreshed.

Proof of Concept

Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account.

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf
{}

→ 200
   The response body's conf object contains a cookieKey field holding the
   server's session-signing key in cleartext.

Differential check against the endpoint that does strip it:

POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf
→ cookieKey is empty, notebookCrypto is null

The same value is withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other.

Impact

An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish RoleReader obtains the server's session-cookie signing key. This is a persistent cryptographic secret whose disclosure cannot be remediated without invalidating every active session. Possession of the key permits forging and tampering with siyuan session cookies that the server will validate as authentic. On instances with no access-auth code configured, or where a forged session's contents otherwise satisfy the server's checks, this extends to authenticating as a privileged user.

Suggested fix

Clear CookieKey in HideConfSecret for all non-administrator responses. The more durable fix is to route non-administrator getConf through the exportConf cloner, which already handles CookieKey, NotebookCrypto, Account, Stat, System.ID, Export.PandocBin and the AI keys replacing the current blocklist, which fails open on every field nobody thought to add, with the allowlist-style cloner the project already maintains.

Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.6

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
7.9

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Related Vulnerabilities
  • CVE-2026-72794
    Alias
  • EUVD-2026-57454
    Alias

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard