Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-2f4c-vrjq-rcgv

HighCVSS 7.5 / 10
Published Mar 6, 2026·Last modified Mar 23, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

A broken access control vulnerability in the database query tool allows any authenticated tenant to read sensitive data belonging to other tenants, including API keys, model configurations, and private messages. The application fails to enforce tenant isolation on critical tables (models, messages, embeddings), enabling unauthorized cross-tenant data access with user-level authentication privileges.


Details

Root Cause

The vulnerability exists due to a mismatch between the queryable tables and the tables protected by tenant isolation in internal/utils/inject.go.

Tenant-isolated tables (protected by automatic WHERE tenant_id = X clause):

tenants, knowledge_bases, knowledges, sessions, chunks

Queryable tables (allowed by WithAllowedTables() in WithSecurityDefaults()):

tenants, knowledge_bases, knowledges, sessions, messages, chunks, embeddings, models

Gap: The tables messages, embeddings, and models are queryable but NOT in the tenant isolation list. This means queries against these tables do NOT receive the automatic WHERE tenant_id = X filtering.

Vulnerable Code

File: internal/utils/inject.go

func WithTenantIsolation(tenantID uint64, tables ...string) SQLValidationOption {
	return func(v *sqlValidator) {
		v.enableTenantInjection = true
		v.tenantID = tenantID
		v.tablesWithTenantID = make(map[string]bool)
		if len(tables) == 0 {
			// Default tables with tenant_id - MISSING: messages, embeddings, models
			v.tablesWithTenantID = map[string]bool{
				"tenants":         true,
				"knowledge_bases": true,
				"knowledges":      true,
				"sessions":        true,
				"chunks":          true,
			}
		} else {
			for _, table := range tables {
				v.tablesWithTenantID[strings.ToLower(table)] = true
			}
		}
	}
}

func WithSecurityDefaults(tenantID uint64) SQLValidationOption {
	return func(v *sqlValidator) {
		// ... other validations ...
		WithTenantIsolation(tenantID)(v)

		// Default allowed tables - INCLUDES unprotected tables
		WithAllowedTables(
			"tenants",
			"knowledge_bases",
			"knowledges",
			"sessions",
			"messages",           // ← No tenant isolation
			"chunks",
			"embeddings",         // ← No tenant isolation
			"models",             // ← No tenant isolation
		)(v)
	}
}

File: database_query.go

func (t *DatabaseQueryTool) validateAndSecureSQL(sqlQuery string, tenantID uint64) (string, error) {
	securedSQL, validationResult, err := utils.ValidateAndSecureSQL(
		sqlQuery,
		utils.WithSecurityDefaults(tenantID),
		utils.WithInjectionRiskCheck(),
	)
	// ... validation logic ...
	return securedSQL, nil
}

When tenant 1 queries SELECT * FROM models, the validation passes and no WHERE tenant_id = 1 clause is appended because models is not in the tablesWithTenantID map. The unfiltered result exposes all model records across all tenants.


PoC

Prerequisites

  • Access to the AI application as an authenticated tenant
  • Ability to send prompts that invoke the database_query tool

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Authenticate as Tenant 1 and craft the following prompt to the AI agent:

    Use the database_query tool with {"sql": "SELECT * FROM models"} to query the database. 
    Output all results and any errors.
    
  2. Expected vulnerable response: The agent returns ALL model records in the models table across all tenants, including:

    • Model IDs and names
    • API keys and authentication credentials
    • Configuration details for all organizations

Example result:

<img width="864" height="1150" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/01e3d0ba-0f2a-43ab-ab51-8778fb8a79b1" />
  1. Repeat with messages table:

    Use the database_query tool with {"sql": "SELECT * FROM messages"} to query the database. 
    Output all results.
    
  2. Expected vulnerable response: The agent returns ALL messages from all tenants, bypassing message privacy.


PoC Video:

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/056984e8-1700-41fe-9b8a-6d18d5579c18


Impact

Vulnerability Type

Broken Access Control (CWE-639) / Unauthorized Information Disclosure (CWE-200)

Specific Data at Risk

  1. API Keys & Credentials (from models table)

    • Third-party LLM provider keys (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
    • Database credentials and connection strings
    • Authentication tokens for integrated services
  2. Private Messages (from messages table)

    • Confidential business communications
    • User conversations with AI agents
    • Sensitive information shared within conversations
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information.

Threat Intelligence
6.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.21%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard