Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p

HighCVSS 7.1 / 10
Published Feb 17, 2026·Last modified Feb 23, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

An access control bypass vulnerability in Gogs web interface allows any repository collaborator with Write permissions to delete protected branches (including the default branch) by sending a direct POST request, completely bypassing the branch protection mechanism. This vulnerability enables privilege escalation from Write to Admin level, allowing low-privilege users to perform dangerous operations that should be restricted to administrators only.

Although Git Hook layer correctly prevents protected branch deletion via SSH push, the web interface deletion operation does not trigger Git Hooks, resulting in complete bypass of protection mechanisms.

Details

Affected Component

  • File: internal/route/repo/branch.go
  • Function: DeleteBranchPost (lines 110-155)
  • Route Configuration: internal/cmd/web.go:589
    m.Post("/delete/*", reqSignIn, reqRepoWriter, repo.DeleteBranchPost)
    

Root Cause

The DeleteBranchPost function performs the following checks when deleting a branch:

  1. ✅ User authentication (reqSignIn)
  2. ✅ Write permission check (reqRepoWriter)
  3. ✅ Branch existence verification
  4. ✅ CommitID matching (optional parameter)
  5. Missing protected branch check
  6. Missing default branch check

While the UI layer (internal/route/repo/issue.go:646-658) correctly checks protected branch status and hides the delete button, attackers can directly construct POST requests to bypass UI restrictions.

Vulnerable Code

Vulnerable implementation (internal/route/repo/branch.go:110-155):

func DeleteBranchPost(c *context.Context) {
	branchName := c.Params("*")
	commitID := c.Query("commit")

	defer func() {
		redirectTo := c.Query("redirect_to")
		if !tool.IsSameSiteURLPath(redirectTo) {
			redirectTo = c.Repo.RepoLink
		}
		c.Redirect(redirectTo)
	}()

	if !c.Repo.GitRepo.HasBranch(branchName) {
		return
	}
	if len(commitID) > 0 {
		branchCommitID, err := c.Repo.GitRepo.BranchCommitID(branchName)
		if err != nil {
			log.Error("Failed to get commit ID of branch %q: %v", branchName, err)
			return
		}

		if branchCommitID != commitID {
			c.Flash.Error(c.Tr("repo.pulls.delete_branch_has_new_commits"))
			return
		}
	}

	// 🔴 Vulnerability: Missing protected branch check here
	// Should add check like:
	// protectBranch, err := database.GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName(c.Repo.Repository.ID, branchName)
	// if protectBranch != nil && protectBranch.Protected { ... }

	if err := c.Repo.GitRepo.DeleteBranch(branchName, git.DeleteBranchOptions{
		Force: true,
	}); err != nil {
		log.Error("Failed to delete branch %q: %v", branchName, err)
		return
	}

	if err := database.PrepareWebhooks(c.Repo.Repository, database.HookEventTypeDelete, &api.DeletePayload{
		Ref:        branchName,
		RefType:    "branch",
		PusherType: api.PUSHER_TYPE_USER,
		Repo:       c.Repo.Repository.APIFormatLegacy(nil),
		Sender:     c.User.APIFormat(),
	}); err != nil {
		log.Error("Failed to prepare webhooks for %q: %v", database.HookEventTypeDelete, err)
		return
	}
}

Correct implementation in Git Hook (internal/cmd/hook.go:122-125):

// check and deletion
if newCommitID == git.EmptyID {
    fail(fmt.Sprintf("Branch '%s' is protected from deletion", branchName), "")
}

Correct UI layer check (internal/route/repo/issue.go:646-658):

protectBranch, err := database.GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName(pull.BaseRepoID, pull.HeadBranch)
if err != nil {
	if !database.IsErrBranchNotExist(err) {
		c.Error(err, "get protect branch of repository by name")
		return
	}
} else {
	branchProtected = protectBranch.Protected
}

c.Data["IsPullBranchDeletable"] = pull.BaseRepoID == pull.HeadRepoID &&
	c.Repo.IsWriter() && c.Repo.GitRepo.HasBranch(pull.HeadBranch) &&
	!branchProtected  // UI layer has check, but backend doesn't

PoC

Prerequisites

  1. Have Write permissions to the target repository (collaborator or team member)
  2. Target repository has protected branches configured (e.g., main, master, develop)
  3. Access to Gogs web interface

Send Malicious POST Request

# Directly send DELETE request bypassing UI protection
curl -X POST \
  -b cookies.txt \
  -H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
  -d "_csrf=YOUR_CSRF_TOKEN" \
  "https://gogs.example.com/username/repo/branches/delete/main"
<img width="1218" height="518" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/745da7c3-6139-408c-9747-ccbe9ea8548f" />

Impact

  • Bypass branch protection mechanism: The core function of protected branches is to prevent deletion, and this vulnerability completely undermines this mechanism
  • Delete default branch: Can cause repository to become inaccessible (git clone/pull failures)
  • Bypass code review: After deleting protected branch, can push new branch bypassing Pull Request requirements
  • Privilege escalation: Writer permission users can perform operations that should only be allowed for Admins
Risk Scores
Base Score
7.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
4.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.44%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard