Know every vulnerabilitybefore it knows you.
DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.
GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4
No affected components available
Name: ASA-2025-001: Malicious peer can disrupt node's ability to sync via blocksync Component: CometBFT [OUTDATED] Criticality: Medium (Considerable Impact; Possible Likelihood per ACMv1.2) Update of Criticality on 2026-03-06: We've made a mistake and over-rated the criticality of this bug in our initial triage. We have calibrated our vulnerability rating internally and updated the criticality of this bug to be Informational (Negligible Impact, Possible Likelihood) Affected versions: <= v0.38.16, v1.0.0 Affected users: Validators, Full nodes
Impact
A malicious peer may be able to interfere with a node's ability to sync blocks with peers via the blocksync mechanism.
In the blocksync protocol peers send their base and latest heights when they connect to a new node (A), which is syncing to the tip of a network. base acts as a lower ground and informs A that the peer only has blocks starting from height base. latest height informs A about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights:
B: {base: 100, latest: 1000}
B: {base: 100, latest: 1001}
B: {base: 100, latest: 1002}
...
If B fails to provide the latest block, B is removed and the latest height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes latest heights.
The existing code hovewer doesn't check for the case where B first reports latest height X and immediately after height Y, where X > Y. For example:
B: {base: 100, latest: 2000}
B: {base: 100, latest: 1001}
B: {base: 100, latest: 1002}
...
A will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. Even if B disconnects, the latest height (target height) won't be recalculated because A "doesn't know where 2000" came from per see.
Impact Qualification
This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting a non-existing latest height, then reporting lower latest height and nodes which are syncing using blocksync protocol.
Patches
The new CometBFT releases v1.0.1 and v0.38.17 fix this issue.
Unreleased code in the main is patched as well.
Workarounds
When the operator notices blocksync is stuck, they can identify the peer from which that message with "invalid" height was received. This may require increasing the logging level of the blocksync module. This peer can then be subsequently banned at the p2p layer as a temporary mitigation.
References
If you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at security@interchain.io. For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.
A Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the CometBFT repository. For more information about CometBFT, see https://docs.cometbft.com/.
EDIT:
Please notice that this has been updated to be informational severity. This can be avoided by ensuring that one is not connected to a malicious peer during blocksync.
The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.
Limited exploitation activity has been observed. Close monitoring and planned remediation are recommended.
The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.
We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.
Browse More
Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.
Checkout DevGuard