Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

GHSA-226f-f24g-524w

HighCVSS 8.5 / 10
Published Jun 17, 2026·Last modified Jun 17, 2026
Affected Components(0)

No affected components available

Description

Summary

backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py::_process_picture_url (v0.9.5, lines 1435-1470) calls validate_url(picture_url) on the initial URL only, then invokes aiohttp.ClientSession.get(picture_url, ...) without allow_redirects=False. aiohttp's default is allow_redirects=True, max_redirects=10; the function does not pass the project's AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS env constant either. An attacker with a valid OAuth IdP identity can therefore submit a public URL that 302-redirects to an internal address and read the internal response body via the attacker's own profile_image_url field.

This is the same redirect-bypass class as CVE-2026-45401 (GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6), on a 6th call site that the v0.9.5 patch missed. CVE-2026-45401's advisory body enumerates exactly five affected paths — SafeWebBaseLoader._scrape, _fetch, get_content_from_url, load_url_image, get_image_base64_from_url — none in utils/oauth.py.

Vulnerable code (v0.9.5)

backend/open_webui/utils/oauth.py, lines 1435-1470:

async def _process_picture_url(self, picture_url: str, access_token: str = None) -> str:
    if not picture_url:
        return '/user.png'
    try:
        validate_url(picture_url)                              # initial URL only

        get_kwargs = {}
        if access_token:
            get_kwargs['headers'] = {'Authorization': f'Bearer {access_token}'}
        async with aiohttp.ClientSession(trust_env=True) as session:
            async with session.get(picture_url, **get_kwargs,
                                   ssl=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_SESSION_SSL) as resp:
            #                       ^^^^^^^^^^^ no allow_redirects=False
                if resp.ok:
                    picture = await resp.read()
                    base64_encoded_picture = base64.b64encode(picture).decode('utf-8')
                    guessed_mime_type = mimetypes.guess_type(picture_url)[0]
                    if guessed_mime_type is None:
                        guessed_mime_type = 'image/jpeg'
                    return f'data:{guessed_mime_type};base64,{base64_encoded_picture}'
                ...

The function is invoked at oauth.py:1556 (new-user OAuth signup) and oauth.py:1536 (existing-user picture update on login). Neither call site re-validates after redirect-following.

backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py (v0.9.5) imports the env constant AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS at line 51 and uses it on the five paths patched by CVE-2026-45401. utils/oauth.py does not import or reference it.

Exploitation

Preconditions:

  • ENABLE_OAUTH_SIGNUP=true or OAUTH_UPDATE_PICTURE_ON_LOGIN=true (common in production OAuth-IdP deployments)
  • Attacker has a valid identity on the configured OAuth IdP (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, or any generic OIDC provider)

Steps:

  1. Attacker hosts a redirect endpoint at http://attacker.example/r on a public IP. validate_url("http://attacker.example/r") returns True (is_global=True for public IPs).
  2. Attacker sets their IdP picture claim to http://attacker.example/r.
  3. Attacker signs in to open-webui via OAuth. open-webui invokes _process_picture_url("http://attacker.example/r", ...).
  4. validate_url accepts the public URL. session.get("http://attacker.example/r") is invoked.
  5. attacker.example responds HTTP/1.1 302 Found\r\nLocation: http://127.0.0.1:11434/api/tags. (Or http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/, RFC1918 internal services, etc.)
  6. aiohttp follows the redirect server-side. No re-validation.
  7. The internal response body is read into picture, base64-encoded, and stored as profile_image_url = "data:image/jpeg;base64,..." on the attacker's account.
  8. Attacker reads back via GET /api/v1/auths/. Decode the base64 payload to get the full internal response body.

Impact

Full-read SSRF, identical read-back primitive to CVE-2026-45338:

  • Cloud metadata services (AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254, GCP metadata.google.internal, Azure IMDS) → IAM credentials, managed-identity tokens
  • Localhost-bound services (Ollama at :11434, Redis, Elasticsearch, internal Postgres exporters)
  • RFC1918 internal infrastructure not exposed to the internet

Distinction from prior CVEs

| Prior CVE | This finding | Distinguishing fact | |---|---|---| | CVE-2026-45338 (GHSA-24c9) | _process_picture_url had no validate_url() call at all | Fixed in v0.9.0 by adding the call. Ours is the call being insufficient because it doesn't loop over redirect targets. Different mechanism, different fix. | | CVE-2026-45400 (GHSA-8w7q) | validate_url() had urlparse-vs-requests parser disagreement on \@ chars | Fixed in v0.9.5 by char-blocklist. Ours is post-validation redirect-following — orthogonal mechanism. | | CVE-2026-45401 (GHSA-rh5x) | Five paths in retrieval, routers/images, utils/files, utils/middleware | Parent class. Same CWE-918 redirect-bypass mechanism. utils/oauth.py::_process_picture_url is not among the five paths in the parent advisory's "Affected code paths" section. Same class, missed sink. Direct sibling. |

Suggested fix

async with session.get(
    picture_url,
    **get_kwargs,
    ssl=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_SESSION_SSL,
    allow_redirects=AIOHTTP_CLIENT_ALLOW_REDIRECTS,   # add
) as resp:

Or, if redirects must remain enabled by default, wrap in a manual-follow loop that re-invokes validate_url() on each Location header. This mirrors the fix shape applied to the five paths in CVE-2026-45401.

Affected versions

Vulnerable: <= 0.9.5 Fix: 0.9.6

References

  • CVE-2026-45401 / GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6 (parent cluster, redirect-bypass on 5 paths)
  • CVE-2026-45338 / GHSA-24c9-2m8q-qhmh (original _process_picture_url SSRF, patched v0.9.0)
  • CVE-2026-45400 / GHSA-8w7q-q5jp-jvgx (validate_url parser-disagreement bypass, patched v0.9.5)
  • open-webui issue #24560 (corroborates that the v0.9.5 redirect-fix was applied piecemeal across call sites)

Proof of Concept

End-to-end PoC executed against ghcr.io/open-webui/open-webui:v0.9.5 in Docker compose. Three services: attacker (OIDC IdP + 302-redirect endpoint on evil.example.com:9001/redirect), canary (internal target on internal-target.local:9002/sentinel), open-webui v0.9.5.

Fresh-CSPRNG sentinel generated after OAuth state-establishing call (per Gate 5.5 oracle protocol): SSRF-POC-5580111b2a0d7d0c8324bfa92a0d9d09.

Result:

  • profile_image_url field after OAuth login: 
  • Base64 decode: SSRF-POC-5580111b2a0d7d0c8324bfa92a0d9d09 (byte-for-byte sentinel match)
  • Canary log: !!! SSRF HIT - sentinel served

Chain confirmed: OAuth login → IdP returns picture claim evil.example.com:9001/redirect → validate_url() accepts FQDN → aiohttp.ClientSession.get(...) follows 302 to internal-target.local:9002/sentinel server-side without re-validation → response body base64-encoded into attacker's profile_image_url → readable via GET /api/v1/auths/.

PoC artifacts (compose, attacker server, canary, run/verify scripts, full transcript) available on request.

Reporter

Matteo Panzeri — GitHub: matte1782, contact: matteo1782@gmail.com. Requesting CVE credit as Matteo Panzeri.

Risk Scores
Base Score
8.5

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is easy for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability. An attacker needs basic access or low-level privileges. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability. The vulnerability can affect other systems as well, not just the initial system. There is a high impact on the confidentiality of the information. There is a low impact on the integrity of the data.

Threat Intelligence
7.8

Exploitation activity has been observed. Apply available patches or mitigations urgently.

EPSS
N/A

Probability that this vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Browse More

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard