Open-Source Security Intelligence

Know every vulnerability
before it knows you.

DevGuard continuously monitors your dependencies and alerts you when CVEs like this one affect your stack — with real-time threat intelligence built for developers.

Search

EEF-CVE-2026-117666

CriticalCVSS 9.1 / 10
Published Oct 30, 2026·Last modified Oct 30, 2026
Affected Components(16)
Hexssl_verify_fun
1.0.1 – 1.1.8
deadtrickster/ssl_verify_fun.erl
1.1.3
deadtrickster/ssl_verify_fun.erl
1.1.2
1 / 6
Description

Summary

Improper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in deadtrickster ssl_verify_fun allows an adversary in the middle to impersonate a TLS peer via a certificate that carries a partial-label wildcard. try_match_wildcard/4 in src/ssl_verify_hostname.erl anchors only the text before and after the * of an identifier such as f*.example.net, so the wildcard also consumes dots and the certificate is accepted for f.evil.example.net. RFC 6125 confines a wildcard to the left-most label. The same matcher lets *.168.1.1 match the IP literal 192.168.1.1. Whole-label wildcards are matched correctly.

Erlang/OTP 20.0 and later check the hostname in ssl before a user verify_fun sees valid_peer, so a client that keeps server_name_indication set rejects the mismatch regardless. Exposed are clients that disable SNI, servers that verify client certificate hostnames with this library, and direct callers of verify_cert_hostname/2.

This issue affects ssl_verify_fun: from 1.0.1 before 1.1.8.

Details

1. Identifier parsing. ssl_verify_hostname:try_match_hostname/2 strips trailing dots, tries an exact case-insensitive match, and otherwise calls parse_and_validate_wildcard_identifier/2. That function accepts an identifier with one * in the left-most label and at least two labels after it, and classifies it as SingleCharW when the label is exactly *.

2. Whole-label wildcard, correct. For *.example.net the matcher compares the text after the * with the hostname from its first dot onward, so a.b.example.net fails because .b.example.net differs from .example.net.

3. Partial-label wildcard, incorrect. For f*.example.net the SingleCharW branch is skipped. try_match_wildcard/4 then checks only that the hostname ends with .example.net and starts with f. Nothing checks the span consumed by the *, so f.evil.example.net and f.a.b.example.net pass. RFC 6125 section 6.4.3 limits a wildcard to the left-most label. The wildcard_not_in_a_label/2 guard only rejects internationalized xn-- labels and does not help.

4. IP literals. The reference identifier is treated as a DNS name whatever its shape, so verify_cert_hostname/2 with hostname 192.168.1.1 matches a dNSName of *.168.1.1 through the whole-label branch. RFC 6125 does not apply wildcard matching to IP addresses, and OTP's ssl converts an IP-literal string to an {ip, ...} reference that only matches iPAddress entries.

5. Interaction with Erlang/OTP. When ssl_verify_hostname:verify_fun/3 is used as verify_fun, OTP 20.0 and later call ssl_certificate:validate/4 for valid_peer before the user fun. In the client role with server_name_indication set to a hostname, or with a peer IP from a socket upgrade, OTP runs public_key:pkix_verify_hostname/3 and hands the user fun {bad_cert, hostname_check_failed} instead of valid_peer, which ssl_verify_fun turns into {fail, ...}. OTP's default match function allows no wildcards, and its https match function (public_key:pkix_verify_hostname_match_fun/1) splits both names on dots and matches the wildcard within the first label only. The ssl_verify_fun result therefore decides the outcome only with {server_name_indication, disable}, in the server role, on direct calls to verify_cert_hostname/2, or on OTP older than 20.0.

Proof of concept

  1. Issue a leaf certificate whose only subjectAltName entry is dNSName f*.example.net, for example with public_key:pkix_test_data/1, and decode it with public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Der, otp).
  2. Call ssl_verify_hostname:verify_cert_hostname(Cert, "foo.example.net"). It returns {valid, "foo.example.net"}, as expected.
  3. Call ssl_verify_hostname:verify_cert_hostname(Cert, "f.evil.example.net"). It returns {valid, "f.evil.example.net"} although the hostname spans two labels where the wildcard sits.
  4. Call ssl_verify_hostname:verify_cert_hostname(Cert, "a.b.example.net") as a control. It returns {fail, unable_to_match_altnames}.
  5. For the IP-literal variant, issue a leaf with dNSName *.168.1.1 and call verify_cert_hostname(Cert, "192.168.1.1"). It returns {valid, "192.168.1.1"}.
  6. To observe the full TLS path, serve the first certificate from ssl:listen/2 and connect with {verify, verify_peer}, the CA in cacerts, {verify_fun, {fun ssl_verify_hostname:verify_fun/3, [{check_hostname, "f.evil.example.net"}]}} and {server_name_indication, disable}. The handshake succeeds. With {server_name_indication, "f.evil.example.net"} instead, OTP 20.0 or later rejects the certificate with hostname_check_failed before ssl_verify_fun runs.

Impact

A holder of a certificate for f*.example.net from a CA the client trusts can impersonate any host named f.<label>.example.net to a client that relies on ssl_verify_fun alone for hostname verification, and read or alter the traffic of that connection.

Workarounds

On Erlang/OTP 21 or later, keep server_name_indication set to the target hostname and pass {customize_hostname_check, [{match_fun, public_key:pkix_verify_hostname_match_fun(https)}]} in the ssl options. The hostname check in ssl then rejects the mismatch before ssl_verify_fun runs, and legitimate wildcard certificates continue to match. hackney and tls_certificate_check already set both options.

Configurations

ssl_verify_fun decides the outcome only where it is the sole hostname check. Erlang/OTP 20.0 and later verify the hostname in ssl before the user verify_fun is called with valid_peer, as long as server_name_indication is a hostname or the connection was upgraded from a socket. A deployment is exposed when it sets {server_name_indication, disable}, when a TLS server uses ssl_verify_hostname:verify_fun/3 to verify client certificates, when it calls ssl_verify_hostname:verify_cert_hostname/2 directly, or when it runs Erlang/OTP older than 20.0. The attacker also needs a certificate with a partial-label wildcard from a CA the client trusts, which the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements do not allow, so the realistic exposure is private PKI.

Upload your SBOM

Upload your own SBOM in CycloneDX 1.6 or higher (JSON) directly here to check your vulnerabilities.

Risk Scores
Base Score
9.1

The vulnerability can be exploited over the network without needing physical access. It is difficult for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and may require special conditions. An attacker does not need any special privileges or access rights. No user interaction is needed for the attacker to exploit this vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence
6.9

Exploitation attempts have been detected. Elevated vigilance and prompt remediation are advised.

EPSS
0.19%

The exploit probability is very low. The vulnerability is unlikely to be exploited in the next 30 days.

Exploit
Not available

We did not find any exploit available. Neither in GitHub repositories nor in the Exploit-Database.

Scan your project

Continuously monitor your dependencies and get alerted when vulnerabilities like this one affect your stack.

Checkout DevGuard